Communication 320 (concise overview): A study of group thinking and problem-solving methods; participation in, and evaluation of, committee, and informal discussion groups. Focus on the roles, networks, and messages employed by small group communicators.
According to the syllabus, This course emphasizes experiential learning where you learn by doing. The final project is designed to develop effective efficiency and work styles using communication.
I do not believe the Service Learning Project is an effective means of accomplishing the previous benchmarks. Although it is my opinion that many of the colleges within Purdue University no longer place the deserved emphasis on "hands on learning", I find in this instance it to be a detrimental education style. The group project is an unnecessary teaching technique for Com 320, because, students are exposed to small groups throughout their collegiate careers; examples of these groups include: social groups, clubs, study groups, group projects, etc; therefore exposing them to another is: redundant, tedious, wastes time and instructional
opportunities. Students are familiar with groups and seldom do groups fail at tasks, but success or failure is an inadequate test of communication. There can be poor group health and still successes made within the group. Perhaps the group even partially dissolved or shut down and all the requirements were met or exceeded. That surely does not mean there was excellent group communication. Conversely there can be groups that constantly communicate but rarely make timely decisions and this is a failure. To learn how to resolve such issues Purdue offers many Organizational Leadership and Supervision courses many of which have labs where learning by doing takes place. Instead emphasis needs to be placed on identifying why individual members of a group are using specific styles of verbal and nonverbal communication and how to effectively reach out and communicate with them. This will be a tough and uncomfortable assignment because it will expose each group member's flaws. It can be uncomfortable to listen to and
criticism can
sometimes be harsh, but this is about correcting mistakes now, in a safe
environment, so they are not painfully learned in the workplace. This requires well orchestrated activities with peer and instructional commentary. An
excellent example of this was on October 21st. It was not without flaws, however, the assignment could have instead I
envision have a situation where a group is observed by the entire class and then an open forum that
lasts perhaps two periods to discuss
communication within the group.
Everyone can identify a poor or
excellent communicator, but what makes each one so. This must be identified and spoken plainly about so successes can be duplicated and shared by all in the group. Only then can problem solving
methods be formulated that improve the functionality of the small group.